|
Mark Cadwallader
Jun 24th, 2005 - 3:37 PM
|
Re: Re: The Pope’s Velociraptor – and the KKK part 2
A nicely told tale about Catholics and Proestants, but I missed any compelling scientific rationale for keeping evolution as is in the science classrooms, nor any arguments as to why we should not tell all about the many weaknesses of evolution. Where is discussion of first principles of science? And why shouldn't we admit in the texts the philosophic rooting in naturalism that evolutionism has?
Once again, just because an extinct crocodile was not as mobile as a present one, is no proof at all about anything. Neither are similarities between inverted skeletons. This carries weight only if one is far down a train of logic based on those faulty premises, i.e., common ancestry, descent through time, and entropy violating genetic change across species groups, etc, etc.
It simply does not convince a scientist like me who wants hard data and forced conclusions, and who is skeptical, not of the Bible, but of the herd mentality, and of premises couched in God-denial.
|